Legal Analysis of a Slip-and-fall Case
[ send me this paper ]
An 11 page extensive analysis of a hypothetical slip-and-fall lawsuit. In this scenario, Tom Hansen slipped and fell while shopping at the Apex Supermarket, incurring a severe hip injury. Mr. Hansen’s accident was due to a spill of an oily liquid on the floor, which created a hazard. Mr. Hansen seeks legal counsel as to whether to pursue a lawsuit against Apex Supermarket in order to receive monetary damages for his injury, but he wishes assurance as to whether or not his case would actually receive a jury trial, or be dismissed due to a summary judgment. The writer cites 3 cases in arguing that Mr. Hansen should not pursue his suit. No bibliography is offered.
Filename: khhansen.rtf

Legal Brief / U.S. Supreme Court Decision # 3
[ send me this paper ]
New York Times v. United States 403 U.S. 713 (1991). Primary issue is whether or not the government has the privilege of enjoining the press prior to publications whenever it feels that national security is at stake.
Filename: Legalbr3.wps

Legal Brief / U.S. Supreme Court Decision # 5
[ send me this paper ]
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397, 109 S.Ct. 2533, 105 L.Ed.2d 242, Argued in 1989. From case : Since the State of Texas conceded that the actions of burning the flag were expressive conduct, the Court had to decide whether the State's regulation of flag burning related to suppression of free speech in order to determine which standard to apply. Then the Court had to decide whether the State had an interest in regulating the speech which overrode the First Amendment protections.
Filename: Sct.wps

Legal Brief : Gibson v. Mayor :
[ send me this paper ]
A 3 page paper that includes the case name and number, a brief synopsis of the facts of the case, the charges made by Gibson against the mayor and council, the investigation, and what the courts ruled. Bibliography lists 2 sources.
Filename: PGlggbs.rtf

Legal Case Analysis
[ send me this paper ]
In 5 pages, the author discusses a legal case scenario using Lyle v. Durham. A memo was created using the facts of the case to make a summation and a judgement concerning the case of Todd v. Gardner. It was decided whether the defendant or the plaintiff in the case was legally the rightful owner of the engagement ring. No additional sources cited.
Filename: Legalc.wps

Legal Case Briefs
[ send me this paper ]
A 25 page document that contains short legal briefs on the following cases: Abrams v. US; Barron v. City of Baltimore; Brown v. Board of Education; Buckley v. Valeo; Cantwell v. State of Connecticut; Da Jonge v. Oregon; Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire; Dred Scot v. Sanford; Engel v. Vitale; Everson v. Board of Education; Francis v. Resweber; Gitlow v. US; Griswold v. Connecticut; Mapp v. Ohio; Marbury v. Madison; McCollum v. Board of Education; Minersville School District v. Gobitis; N.Y. Times v. US; National Socialist Party v. Village of Skokie; Near v. Minnesota; Nebraska Press Association v. Stuart; Palko v. Connecticut; Plessy v. Ferguson; Roe v. Wade; Schenck v. US; University of California v. Bakke; Weeks v. US; Wolf v. Colorado; and Worcester v. State of Georgia. These briefs are available in whole or in parts. Please email us for more information if you would like to purchase one or more individual briefs.
Filename: 99brfs29.rtf

Try finding it by keyword!  Enter a phrase here: